Cities by the East Sea

The purpose of the cities by the east sea take on a new and important meaning with this model. It becomes clear why Moroni finds it critical to invest time and money building "cities by the east sea" during war time. These cities serve as a defense from the Lamanites coming across the sea.

The Lamanites are on both the east shore of the Chesapeake (land of first inheritance) and the west shore, below the land of Zarahemla. Although the text doesn't say exactly, they would most likely be found on the west of the Potomac river (west sea). This would be how the Lamanites could attack from the "west sea."  

(Add map)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

River Sidon

Image
  I n 1608, Captain John Smith explored the Chesapeake Bay and sailed up the Patuxent River. His claim that "Heaven and Earth never agreed better to frame a place for Man's habitation” lured many English colonist to America. (1) Another major geographical feature that must be reconciled in the land southward is the river Sidon. We propose the Patuxent River as the river Sidon. Near the Patuxent River are hills and valleys on both the east and west side of the river, consistent with the text in the Book of Mormon and large enough to hide armies (Alma 43).  One common conclusion is that the river Sidon must flow south to north because the “head” is near Manti and we know that the river Sidon also flows past Zarahemla, which is north of Manti. This is assuming “head” means the beginning of the river. Another definition of “head” found in the 1828 Noah Webster’s Dictionary is “conflux.” In the same dictionary “conflux” is defined as “ a flowing together; a meeting of two or more c
Read more

The Land of the Book of Mormon

Image
"It has been my experience that most members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, when confronted with a Book of Mormon geography, worry about the wrong things. Almost invariably the first question that arises is whether the geography fits the archaeology of the proposed area. This should be our second question, the first being whether the geography fits the facts of the Book of Mormon- a question we all can answer without being versed in American archaeology. Only after a given geography reconciles all of the significant geographic details given in the Book of Mormon does the question of archaeological and historical detail merit attention. The Book of Mormon must be the final and most important arbiter in deciding the correctness of a given geography; otherwise, we will be forever hostage to the shifting sands of expert opinion."                      -John E. Clark(1)   The goal of this site is to show how one model "reconciles all the significant geogra
Read more